Rubrics

The key to having effective assessment is to have a concrete rubric that can be provided to students with the assignment and make grading easier when the assignment is submitted. Below are some of the rubrics I've used for assignments in the past.

Short and Extended Response Rubrics

These rubrics were originally designed based off the 2- and 4-point questions on the WASL. I continue to find them useful for short and extended responses as they give a concrete way to assess these responses without asking for a word count.

Short Response

2 points
Includes two textual examples and explanation of how they support the answer.
1 point
Includes one textual example and explanation of how it supports the answer.
0 points
Includes no textual examples or no explanations of how they support the answer.

Extended Response

(4) Exceeds Standard
(3) Meets Standard
(2) Approaching Standard
(1) Incomplete
Well-constructed, organized paragraphs that thoroughly address the questions using logic and reason

4 specific textual references

Grammatically correct responses that account for spelling and usage rules
Organized paragraphs that address the questions using logic and reason

3 textual references

Grammatically correct responses that account for spelling and usage rules
Paragraphs that address the questions using logic and reason

2 textual references

Response needs to be edited for grammar and spelling
Answer is not logically organized

Missing text-based references

Grammar/spelling not accounted for
4 points
Well-constructed, organized paragraphs that thoroughly address the questions using logic and reason

4 specific textual references

Grammatically correct responses that account for spelling and usage rules
3 points
Organized paragraphs that address the questions using logic and reason

3 textual references

Grammatically correct responses that account for spelling and usage rules
2 points
Paragraphs that address the questions using logic and reason

2 textual references

Response needs to be edited for grammar and spelling
1 point
Answer is not logically organized

Missing text-based references

Grammar/spelling not accounted for

Writing Rubric

Writing is perhaps one of the most challenging assignments to evaluate. There are many abstract concepts that create a powerful paper. How do you measure a student's use of voice? How do you teach a student to organize an essay without limiting the creativity of what they might come up with? These are skills that are developed over time and with practice. Having used a variety of rubrics related to the writing process, I discovered that by focusing on the writing process—prewriting, drafting, revising, editing, and publishing—I was able to get better writing from my students while also providing a concrete grading rubric. As students were required to work on and submit multiple drafts of their work, they began to grow in their writing through the self-reflection inherent in the writing process.

Category
(8) Advanced
(7) Proficient
(6) Meets Standard
(5 or less) Below Standard

Pre-write

Synthesizes ideas from multiple sources to illustrate or explain a concept.

Paper is concentrated on a specific thesis.

Method of organization deliberately fits the paper’s theme.
Shows many ideas were generated.

Paper is focused and narrowed to one aspect of topic.

Ideas are clearly organized.
Shows adequate ideas were generated.

Paper is focused and narrowed to one aspect of topic.

Ideas are organized.
Shows few or no ideas generated.

Paper is focused and narrowed to one aspect of topic.

Ideas are clearly organized.

Rough Draft and Revising

Author has first draft that provides more than enough writing to work with.

Author has shown competency in ability to revise work by removing all superfluous information and adding necessary explanation to give a complete picture.
Author has first draft that provides more than enough writing to work with.

Author has shown competency in ability to revise work
Author has first draft that provides enough writing to work with.

Author has shown ability to revise work
Author has a first draft that is just begun or is missing.

Author has limited revising not revised at all.

Editing and Final Copy

Includes all elements required in assignment description and shows evidence of research/synthesis to deepen your understanding of the subject as shown through your evaluation.

Final copy is free of errors in grammar, spelling, and punctuation.
Author has provided a professional final copy with academic integrity, meaning MLA, APA, or Chicago Manual rules are followed.
Includes all elements required in assignment description and shows evidence of deliberate decision making on the part of the author.

Final copy is free of errors in grammar, spelling, and punctuation.

Author has provided a clean, professional final copy with a title and by-line.
Includes all required elements in assignment description.

Final has few errors in grammar, spelling, and punctuation.

Author has provided a clean, professional final copy with a title and by-line.
Is missing more than one of the required elements in assignment description.

Final copy has many errors in grammar, spelling, and punctuation.

Author has provided a final copy that is unprofessional and/or lacks a title or by-line.